It characterizes the most cited retracted articles authored by Brazilian researchers, typifies post-retraction citations, and identifies patterns and outliers associated with the cited and citing documents analyzed. It uses the bibliometric method and the technique of citation analysis, configuring itself as exploratory research. From the results obtained from the analysis of 512 citations distributed in 407 citing documents, it was identified that 75.8% consisted of neutral citations 23.0% of positive citations and 1.2% of negative mentions. The prevalence of neutral citations shows that these articles continue to be cited as documents present in the literature without judging their scientific validity.@en
Array ( [dateOfAvailability] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2023-02-27] => 216825 ) ) ) [hasAuthor] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Karen Santos-D?amorim] => 217765 ) [1] => Array ( [Rinaldo Ribeiro de Melo] => 146603 ) [2] => Array ( [Anna Elizabeth Galvão Coutinho Correia] => 7391 ) [3] => Array ( [Májory Miranda] => 191284 ) [4] => Array ( [Murilo Artur Araújo da Silveira] => 6631 ) [5] => Array ( [Karen Santos-d’amorim] => 244667 ) ) ) [hasFileStorage] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [_repository/47/2023/04/oai_seer_ufrgs_br_article_125494#00002.pdf] => 221754 ) ) ) [hasPageEnd] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [:em branco:] => 332 ) ) ) [hasPageStart] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [125494] => 217764 ) ) ) [hasSectionOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Artigo] => 3 ) ) ) [hasSubject] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Retracted article] => 217759 ) [1] => Array ( [Citation analysis] => 265953 ) [2] => Array ( [Post-retraction citation] => 217760 ) [3] => Array ( [Research integrity] => 209936 ) [4] => Array ( [Research misconduct] => 187010 ) [5] => Array ( [Citation analysis] => 3133 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Artigo retratado] => 217761 ) [1] => Array ( [Análise de citação] => 263775 ) [2] => Array ( [Citação pós-retratação] => 217762 ) [3] => Array ( [Integridade na pesquisa] => 103795 ) [4] => Array ( [Má conduta na pesquisa] => 217763 ) ) ) [wasPublicationInDate] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2023-02-27] => 216825 ) ) ) [hasLanguageExpression] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [pt] => 232736 ) ) ) [hasLicense] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Copyright (c)] => 232755 ) [1] => Array ( [CCBY4.0] => 232756 ) ) ) [isPartOfSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Em questão] => 47 ) ) ) [hasIssueOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [ISSUE:JNL:00002-2023-29-] => 210945 ) ) ) [hasAbstract] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [It characterizes the most cited retracted articles authored by Brazilian researchers, typifies post-retraction citations, and identifies patterns and outliers associated with the cited and citing documents analyzed. It uses the bibliometric method and the technique of citation analysis, configuring itself as exploratory research. From the results obtained from the analysis of 512 citations distributed in 407 citing documents, it was identified that 75.8% consisted of neutral citations 23.0% of positive citations and 1.2% of negative mentions. The prevalence of neutral citations shows that these articles continue to be cited as documents present in the literature without judging their scientific validity.] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Caracteriza os artigos retratados mais citados autorados por pesquisadores brasileiros, tipifica as citações pós-retratação e identifica padrões e outliers associados aos documentos citados e citantes analisados. Utiliza o método bibliométrico e a técnica de análise de citações, configurando-se como uma pesquisa exploratória. Dos resultados obtidos a partir da análise de 512 citações distribuídas em 407 documentos citantes, identificou-se que 75,8% consistiam em citações neutras, 23,0% em citações positivas e 1,2% em menções negativas. A prevalência das citações neutras mostra que estes artigos continuam sendo citados como documentos presentes na literatura, sem o julgamento de sua validade científica, o que também levanta preocupações sobre as práticas de citação na Academia.] => 0 ) ) ) [hasID] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125494] => 0 ) ) ) [hasRegisterId] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125494] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [10.19132/1808-5245.29.125494] => 0 ) ) ) [hasSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 125494] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 125494] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [1808-5245] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [1807-8893] => 0 ) ) ) [hasTitle] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Retracted and still cited: profile of post-retraction citations in articles by Brazilian researchers] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Retratados e ainda citados: perfil de citações pós-retratação em artigos de pesquisadores brasileiros] => 0 ) ) ) [hasUrl] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125494/87831] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125494] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125494/87831] => 0 ) ) ) [prefLabel] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125494#00002] => 0 ) ) ) [hasDOI] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [10.19132/1808-5245.29.125494] => 0 ) ) ) )
Loading ...