This work analyzed the evaluation process of the libraries of the Federal University of Paraíba, based on the evaluation indicators of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira, the International Organization for Standardization 11620 of 2014 and the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Qualitative in nature, the research included a bibliographic and documentary survey. In the treatment of collected data, the technique used is content analysis. The sources were the official documents of institutional and federal evaluations, the Institutional Development Plan 2019-2023 and the 2020 self-assessment of the aforementioned University. We conclude that, when analyzing the evaluation processes used by the libraries of the Federal University of Paraíba in the light of the focused evaluation guidelines, there is a gap between such indicators and the instruments of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira, as well as the institutional instruments. We note the need for a specific assessment in order to better diagnose and support management, in the improvement process and in the constant technological updates imposed by a digital society.@en
Array ( [dateOfAvailability] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2022-12-12] => 210652 ) ) ) [hasAuthor] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Mara Leurany Jorge Maia] => 210978 ) [1] => Array ( [José Jassuipe da Silva Morais] => 210979 ) ) ) [hasFileStorage] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [_repository/47/2023/01/oai_seer_ufrgs_br_article_124299#00002.pdf] => 212669 ) ) ) [hasPageEnd] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [:em branco:] => 332 ) ) ) [hasPageStart] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [124299] => 210977 ) ) ) [hasSectionOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Artigo] => 3 ) ) ) [hasSubject] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Higher education evaluation] => 210975 ) [1] => Array ( [University libraries] => 265046 ) [2] => Array ( [Evaluation of libraries] => 70919 ) [3] => Array ( [Evaluation of university libraries] => 188260 ) [4] => Array ( [Federal university of paraíba] => 296475 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Avaliação do ensino superior] => 210976 ) [1] => Array ( [Avaliação de biblioteca] => 1062 ) [2] => Array ( [Biblioteca universitária] => 233546 ) [3] => Array ( [Avaliação de biblioteca universitária] => 39572 ) [4] => Array ( [Universidade federal da paraíba] => 245443 ) [5] => Array ( [Avaliação de bibliotecas] => 238605 ) [6] => Array ( [Bibliotecas universitárias] => 199222 ) [7] => Array ( [Avaliação de bibliotecas universitárias] => 188264 ) ) ) [wasPublicationInDate] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2022-12-12] => 268487 ) ) ) [hasLanguageExpression] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [pt] => 232736 ) ) ) [hasLicense] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Copyright (c)] => 232755 ) [1] => Array ( [CCBY4.0] => 232756 ) ) ) [isPartOfSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Em questão] => 47 ) ) ) [hasIssueOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [ISSUE:JNL:00002-2023-29-] => 210945 ) ) ) [hasAbstract] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [This work analyzed the evaluation process of the libraries of the Federal University of Paraíba, based on the evaluation indicators of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira, the International Organization for Standardization 11620 of 2014 and the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Qualitative in nature, the research included a bibliographic and documentary survey. In the treatment of collected data, the technique used is content analysis. The sources were the official documents of institutional and federal evaluations, the Institutional Development Plan 2019-2023 and the 2020 self-assessment of the aforementioned University. We conclude that, when analyzing the evaluation processes used by the libraries of the Federal University of Paraíba in the light of the focused evaluation guidelines, there is a gap between such indicators and the instruments of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira, as well as the institutional instruments. We note the need for a specific assessment in order to better diagnose and support management, in the improvement process and in the constant technological updates imposed by a digital society.] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Este trabalho analisou o processo de avaliação das bibliotecas da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, baseado nos indicadores de avaliação do Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira, da Organização Internacional de Normalização 11620 de 2014 e da Federação Internacional de Associações e Instituições Bibliotecárias. De natureza qualitativa, a pesquisa contou com levantamento bibliográfico e documental. No tratamento dos dados coletados, a técnica utilizada é a análise de conteúdo. As fontes foram os documentos oficiais das avaliações institucionais e federais, o Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional 2019-2023 e a autoavaliação de 2020 da referida Universidade. Concluímos que, ao analisar os processos avaliativos utilizados pelas bibliotecas da Universidade Federal da Paraíba à luz das diretrizes de avaliação enfocadas, há uma lacuna entre tais indicadores e os instrumentos do Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira, bem como os instrumentos institucionais. Constatamos a necessidade de uma avaliação específica com finalidade de melhor diagnosticar e servir de apoio à gestão, no processo de melhoria e nas constantes atualizações tecnológicas impostas por uma sociedade digital.] => 0 ) ) ) [hasID] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/124299] => 0 ) ) ) [hasRegisterId] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/124299] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [10.19132/1808-5245.29.124299] => 0 ) ) ) [hasSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 124299] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 124299] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [1808-5245] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [1807-8893] => 0 ) ) ) [hasTitle] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Analysis of the evaluation process of university libraries] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Análise do processo de avaliação de bibliotecas universitárias] => 0 ) ) ) [hasUrl] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/124299/87052] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/124299] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/124299/87052] => 0 ) ) ) [prefLabel] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/124299#00002] => 0 ) ) ) [hasDOI] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [10.19132/1808-5245.29.124299] => 0 ) ) ) )
Loading ...