Proceeding Brapci-Revistas
Michely Jabala Mamede Vogel
Douglas Henrique Milanez
Ed Noyons
Nair Yumiko Kobashi
Leandro Faria

[erro abnt]

References

  • ACADEMIC RANKING OF WORLD UNIVERSITIES. About Academic Ranking of World Universities. Disponível em: ttp://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html . Acesso em: 13 jul. 2014.
  • AGUILLO, I. F. et al. Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 85, n. 1, p. 243-256, 23 fev. 2010.
  • BILLAUT, J.-C.., BOUYSSOU, D.., VINCKE, P. Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 84, n. 1, p. 237-263, 2 dez. 2009.
  • BUELA-CASAL, G. et al. Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 71, n. 3, p. 349 365, jun. 2007.
  • CLAPHAM, C.., NICHOLSON, J. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2013. Disponível em:
  • http://www.oxfordreference.com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2048/view/10.1093/acref/9780199235940.001.0001/acref-9780199235940 . Acesso em: 13 jul. 2014.
  • CWTS BRAZILIAN RESEARCH RANKING. Methodology. 2014. Disponível em: http://brr.cwts.nl/methodology/datacollection . Acesso em: 13 de jul. 2014.
  • CWTS LEIDEN RANKING. Methodology. 2014. Disponível em: http://leidenranking.com/methodology/datacollection . Acesso em: 13 de jul. 2014.
  • DE FILIPPO, D. et al. Visibility in international rankings. Strategies for enhancing the competitiveness of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v.93, n.3, p.949-966, 2012.
  • DILL, D. D.., SOO, M. Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, Amsterdam, v. 49, n.4, p.495-533, jun. 2005.
  • FERNANDES, I.., NUNES, E. Rankigs internacionais: a irresistível polêmica em torno de seus sentidos e metodologias. Rio de Janeiro: Observatório Universitário, 2011. (Documento de trabalho, 97). Disponível em: http://www.observatoriouniversitario.org.br/documentos_de_trabalho/documentos_de_trabalho_97.pdf . Acesso em: 5 jul. 2014.
  • FOLHA DE S. PAULO. Como é feito o Ranking Universitário Folha. 2013. Disponível em: http://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2013/comoefeitooruf/. Acesso em 14 de jul. 2013.
  • QS TOP UNIVERSITIES. QS Top Universities. Disponível em: http://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings . Acesso em: 13 jul. 2014.
  • RANKING WEB OF UNIVERSITIES. Methodology. Dsiponível em: http://www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology . Acesso em 13 jul. 2014.
  • SCIMAGO RESEARCH GROUP. Metodology (English). 2014. Disponível em: http://www.scimagoir.com/pdf/iber/SCImago%20Institutions%20Rankings%20IBER%20en.pdf . Acesso em: 13 jul. 2014.
  • TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS. World University Rankings 2013-2014 methodology. Disponível em: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/worldranking/methodology . Acesso em 13 jul. 2014.
  • U-MULTIRANK. Methodology. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.umultirank. eu/#!/methodology?trackType=homeamp.,sightMode=undefined . Acesso em: 13 jul. 2014.
  • WALTMAN, L. et. al. The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: data collection, indicators and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v.63, n.12, p.2419-2432, 2012.
  • WALTMAN, L.., VAN ECK, N. J. A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v.63, n.12, p. 2378 2392, dez. 2012.
NLP0.29
Visto 10 vezes
sem referências