Proceeding Brapci-Revistas
Ana Maria Mattos
Eduardo josé wense dias

References

  • AHLGREN, P.., JARNEVING, B.., ROUSSEAU, R. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 6, p. 550-560, 2003.
  • BATAGELJ, V.., MRVAR, A. Pajek: program for analysis and visualization of large networks reference manual, list of commands with short explanation version 1.26. 2010. Disponível em: http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/doc/pajekman.pdf. Acesso em 02 maio 2010.
  • BENSMAN, S. J. Pearson’s R and author cocitation analysis: a commentary on the controversy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, p. 10, p. 935, 2004.
  • BJÖRNEBORN, L INGWERSEN, P. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, n. 14, p. 1216-1227, 2004.
  • BOYACK, K. W.., WYLIE, B. N.., DAVIDSON, G. S. Domain visualization using VxInsight for science and technology management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 53, n. 9, p. 764-774, 2002.
  • CHEN, C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 57, n. 3, p. 359-377, 2006.
  • CHEN, C. Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 101, supl. 1, p. 5303- 5310, April 6, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.pnas.org/content/101/suppl.1/5303.full.pdf. Acesso em 02 maio 2010.
  • EOM, S. Author cocitation analysis: quantitative methods for mapping the intellectual structure of an academic discipline. Hershey: IGI Global, 2009.
  • EOM, S. Author co-citation analysis using custom bibliographic databases: an introduction to the SAS approach. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2003.
  • GLÄNZEL, W. Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.norslis.net/2004/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf. Acesso em 05 maio 2010.
  • GARFIELD, E. From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography: a citationist’s tribute to Belver C. Griffith. 2001. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/drexelbelvergriffith92001.pdf. Acesso em 02 maio 2010.
  • JARNEVING, B. A variation of the calculation of the first author cocitation strength in author cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, v. 77, n. 3, p. 485–504, 2008.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L.., VAUGHAN, L. Co-occurrence matrices and their application in information science: extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 57, n. 12, p. 1616 1628, 2006.
  • LIN, X.., WHITE, H. D.., BUZYDLOWSKI, J. Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching. Information Processing amp., Management, v. 39, n. 5, p. 689-706, 2003.
  • LINDSEY, D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, v. 10, p. 145-162, 1980.
  • MCCAIN, K. Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 41, n. 6, p. 433-443, 1990.
  • MCINTIRE, J. S. The clothing and textile research base: an author cocitation study. 2006, 172 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri, 2006.
  • NOYONS, E. C. M. Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research
  • management tool. Leiden: CWTS, Universiteit Leiden, 1999.
  • O'CONNOR, D. O.., VOOS, H. Empirical Laws, Theory Construction, and Bibliometrics. Library Trends, v. 30, n. 1, p. 9-20, 1981.
  • OKUBO, Y. Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and exemples. Paris: OECD Science, 1997.
  • PERSSON, O. All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 339-344, 2001.
  • PRICE, D. S. The analysis of square matrices of scientometrics transactions. Scientometrics, v. 3, n. 1, p. 55-63, 1981.
  • PRICE, D. S. O desenvolvimento da ciência: análise histórica, filosófica, sociológica e econômica. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos, 1976.
  • ROUSSEAU, R.., ZUCCALA, A. A classification of author co-citations: definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, n. 6, p. 513-529, 2004.
  • SCHNEIDER, J. W.., LARSEN, B.., INGWERSEN, P. A comparative study of first and allauthor co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, v. 80, n. 1, p. 105–132, 2009.
  • SMITH, L. C. Citation analysis. Library Trends, v. 30, n. 1, p. 83-106, Summer 1981.
  • WHITE, H. D. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson’s r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 31, p. 250–259, 2003.
  • WHITE, H. D.., GRIFFITH, B. Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 32, n. 2, p. 163-171, 1981.
NLP0.29
Visto 15 vezes
sem referências