Proceeding Brapci-Revistas
Nadi Helena Presser
Edivanio Duarte de Souza

[erro abnt]

References

  • BARBOSA, J. Schopenhauer. In: PECORARO, L. (org.). Os filósofos: clássicos da filosofia, v. II de Kant a Popper. Petrópolis, R. J.: Vozes., Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio, 2008.
  • COURTRIGHT, C. Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 41, p. 273-306, 2007.
  • FURTADO, A. T.., CARVALHO, R. Q. Padrões de intensidade tecnológica da indústria brasileira: um estudo comparativo com os países centrais. Perspectiva, São Paulo, v. 19, n. 1,mar. 2005.
  • HJØRLAND, B. Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 53, n. 4, p. 257-270, 2002.
  • ______. Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science. Library Trends, v. 52, n. 3, p. 488-506, 2004.
  • ______.., ALBRECHTSEN, H. Toward a new horizon in Information Science: domainanalysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,Washington, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, jul. 1995. Disponível em: lt.,http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-571(199507)46:6%3C400::AIDASI2%3E3.0.CO.,2-Y/pdfgt.,. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2011.
  • JÄRVELIN, K.., INGWERSEN, P. Information seeking research needs extension towards tasks and technology. Information Research: an international electronic journal, v.10, n.1. 2004.
  • KARI, J.., SAVOLAINEN, R. Towards a contextual model of information seeking on the Web. New review of information behaviour research, v, 4, n. 1, p. 155-175, 2003.
  • MACKENZIE, M. L. An exploratory study investigating the information behaviour of line managers within a business environment. New review of information behaviour research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 63-78, 2003.
  • MATURANA, H. ., VARELA, F. Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. London: Reidl, 1980.
  • MORGAN, G. Imagem da organização. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
  • OECD. Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação dos dados sobre inovação. 3. ed. São Paulo: Finep, 2005. Disponível em: lt.,http://www.finep.gov.br/imprensa/sala_imprensa/manual_de_oslo.pdfgt.,. Acesso em: 22 maio 2012.
  • PÊCHEUX, M. Semântica e discurso: uma crítica a afirmação do óbvio. 4. ed. Campinas, SP: Ed Unicamp, 2009. 287p.
  • PETTIGREW, K. E.., FIDEL, R.., BRUCE, H. Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 35, p. 43-78, 2001.
  • SARACEVIC, T. Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 50, n. 12, p. 1051-1063, 1999.
  • ______. Users lost: reflections on the past, future, and limits of Information Science. SIGIR forum, v. 31, n. 2, p. 16-27, 1997. Disponível em:lt.,http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/articles.htmgt.,. Acesso em: 19 maio 2012.
  • SONNENWALD, D. H. Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN INFORMATION NEEDS, SEEKING AND USE IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS, 1998, Sheffield, UK. Proceeding… London, UK: Taylor Graham, 1999. p. 176-190.
  • TALJA, S. Constituting “information” and “user” as research objects: a theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN INFORMATION NEEDS, SEEKING AND USE IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS, 1996, London. Proceeding… London, UK: Taylor Graham, 1997. p. 67-80,
  • WEICK, K. E. The Social Psychology of organizing. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1979.
  • WILSON, T. D. Human information behavior. Informing Science, v. 3, n. 2, p. 49-55, 2000.
  • ______. On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, v. 37, p. 3-15, 1981.
NLP0.29
Visto 10 vezes
sem referências