Proceeding Brapci-Revistas

[erro abnt]

References

  • ADLER, N. Health disparities: monitoring, mechanism, and meaning. In: NIH Conference on understanding and reducing disparities in health: behavioral and social sciences research contributions from the behavioral ans social sciences. Proceedings., 2006., Bethesda. Maryland: NIH., 2006. p.23. Disponível em: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/news_and_events/conferences_and_workshops/HealthDisparities/images/Health%20Disparities%20Final.pdf. Acesso em 30 jan. 2011.
  • ADLER, P. A. , SEOK-WOO, K. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. The Academy of management review, v. 27, n. 1, p. 17-40, 2002. Disponível em: lt.,http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~xinl/library/papers/social/social_capital.pdfgt.,. Acesso em 15 jan. 2011
  • BUCKLAND, M. Information and information systems. Westport: Greenwood., 1991.
  • CARBO, T., SMITH, M. M. Global information ethics: intercultural perspectives on past and future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science amp., Research., v. 59, n. 7, p. 1111-23, 2008.
  • CASTIEL L., SANZ-VALERO, J. El acceso a la información como determinante social de la salud. Nutr hosp., supl.3, p. 26-30, 2010.
  • COLEMAN, J. Foundations of social theories: a theory of social structure and action. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1990. p. 300-21.
  • Comissão Nacional sobre Determinantes Sociais da Saúde, Brasil - CNDSS. As causas sociais das iniqüidades em saúde no Brasil. Relatório Final, 2008. Disponível em: lt.,http://www.cndss.fiocruz.br/ pdf/home/relatorio.pdfgt.,. Acesso em 30 jan. 2011.
  • DOCTOR, R. D. Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 42, n. 3, p. 216-28, 1991.
  • FARBER, D. A. Free speech without romance: public choice and the first amendment. Harvard law review, v. 105, n. 2, p.554-83, 1991.
  • GONZALES DE GOMEZ, M. N. Da política de informação ao papel da informação na política. Revista Internacional de Estudos Políticos NUSEG/UERJ, v. 1, n.1, p. 67-93, 1999.
  • GRIMSHAW, J.M. et al. 2004. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, v. 8, n. 6, p.iii–iv, 1–72.
  • GUIMARÃES, M. C. S. Entre o superlativo e o diminutivo: as tecnologias a serviço da difusão da informação científica. In: MANDARINO, A. C. S., GOMBERG, E. Leituras de novas tecnologias e saúde. Salvador: EDUFBA., 2009.
  • HAMILTON, S., PORS, N. O. Freedom of access to information and freedom of expression: the internet as a tool for global social inclusion. Library Management, v. 24, n. 8/9, p.407-416, 2003.
  • IFLA. Libraries and intellectual freedom, 2007, p. 1.
  • ISLAM, M. K. et al.Social capital and health: does egalitarianism matter? A literature review. Int. J. Equity Health, v. 5, n. 3, 2006. Disponível em: lt.,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524772/pdf/1475-9276-5-3.pdfgt.,. Acesso em 30 jan. 2011
  • JAEGER, P. T. : BURNETT, G. Information access and exchange among small worlds in a democratic society: the role of policy in shaping information behavior in the post-9/11 United States. Library Quarterly, v. 75, n. 4, p. 464-95, 2005. Acesso em 15 jan. 2011.
  • KAWACHI, I. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health, v. 87, n. 9, p. 1491–1498, 1997.
  • KRIEGER, N. Theories for social epidemiology in the twenty first century: an echos social prospects. International Journal of Epidemiology, v. 30, n. 4, p. 668-77, 2001.
  • LIEVROUW, L. A.., FARB, S. E. Information and equity. Annual review of information science, 37, p. 499-540, 2003.
  • LINK B., PHELAN, J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav., p. 80-94, 1995 (extra issue).
  • LOR, P. J. ., BRITZ, J. J. Is a knowledge society possible without freedom of access to information? Journal of Information Science, v. 22, n. 4, p. 387-397, 2007.
  • MATHIESEN, K. What is information ethics? Computers amp., Society. v. 34, p. 1, 2004.
  • MCCREADIE, M., RICE, R. E. Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing amp., Management, v. 35, p. 45-76, 1999.
  • MCCREADIE, M.., RICE, R. E. Trends in analyzing access to information. Part II: Unique and integrating conceptualizations. Information Processing amp., Management., v. 35, n. 1, p. 77-99, 1999
  • NIELSEN-BOHLMAN, L et al. (Eds). Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, The National Academies Press, 2004.
  • OLTMANN, S. M. Information Acces.. Bloomington, Indiana University, School of Library and Information Science, 2009 (Qualifying Paper). Disponível em: lt.,http://bpm.slis.indiana.edu/scholarship/oltmann_paper.pdfgt.,. Acesso em 15 jan. 2011.
  • PELLEGRINI FILHO, A. Inequidades de acceso a la información e inequidades de salud. Rev Panam Salud Publica.., v. 11, n. 5/6, p.409-13, 2002
  • PORTES, A. Social Capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 24, p. 1-24, 1998
  • REDDICK, A. Citizens and the internet: policy opportunities and challenges. In: ADAMS, K. G., BIRDSALL, W. F. (Eds.). Access to information in a digital world. Ottawa: Canadian Library Association., 2004. p. 7-30
  • SCHILLER, H. Living the number 1 society. Gazette: the international journal of communicatin studies, v. 60, n. 2, p. 181-96, 1998.
  • SOLAR, O., IRWIN, A. A Conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health: discussion paper for the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2007.
  • SWEETLAND, J. H. Information poverty: let me count the way. Database, v. 16, n. 4, p. 8-10, 1993.
  • VAAGAN, R. The LIS infoethical survival kit. Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly., v. 38, n. 1, 2005.
  • WHITEHEAD, M., BURSTRÖMB, B., DIDERICHSENB, F. Social policies and the pathways to inequalities in health: a comparative analysis of lone mothers in Britain and Sweden. Social Science amp., Medicine, v. 50, n. 2, p. 255-270, 2000.
  • WILSON, T. D. ., ALLEN, D. K.(Eds.) Exploring the contexts of information behavior. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN INFORMATION NEEDS, SEEKING AND USE IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS, 2. Proceedings. London: Taylor Graham, 1998.
  • WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION - WHO. World report on knowledge for better health. 2004 Disponível em: lt.,http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/WR2004_english_report_summary.pdfgt.,. Acesso em 30 jul. 2007.
  • YU, L. Understanding information inequality: making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, v. 38, p. 229-52, 2006.
NLP0.29
Visto 10 vezes
sem referências