Article Brapci-Revistas

Um ponto de vista ecológico estendido para avaliar inovações tecnológicas

An Extended ecological point of view to evaluate technological innovations

ponto de vista ecológico estendido para avaliar inovações tecnológicas

Giovanni Moura de Holanda
Carolina Vaghetti Mattos
Angela Maria Alves

This paper describes an analytical approach based on a non-conventional ecological perspective to evaluate the quality of technological innovation projects. The approach is semi-qualitative and focuses on aspects of cooperation in projects and companies with favorable conditions regarding technological advancement and learning maturity, highlighting contributions of these aspects to the sustainability of R&D projects. Moreover, it considers the multidimensionality of a project in order to classify how its innovations align with sustainable principles, in terms of balancing the needs of all stakeholders. Beyond technology, the multiple dimensions associated to a project and its impacts comprise, for example, the economic, social, human and environmental spheres; similarly to the arrangement of forces for survival and evolution in comprehensive ecosystems, hence the allusive use of the term “extended ecological perspective”. Complexity theory and interrelation of the concepts of sustainability, cooperation, learning and multidimensionality underlie this analytical approach of innovations resulting from R&D efforts.@en

Este artigo descreve uma abordagem baseada em uma perspectiva ecológica não convencional para avaliar a qualidade de projetos de inovação tecnológica. A abordagem é semi-qualitativa e focaliza os aspectos de cooperação em projetos e empresas com condições favoráveis em termos de avanço tecnológico e maturidade de aprendizagem, destacando contribuições desses aspectos para a sustentabilidade de projetos de P&D. Ademais, considera a multidimensionalidade de um projeto no sentido de classificar como suas inovações alinham-se com princípios de sustentabilidade, no que se refere ao equilíbrio das necessidades de todos os stakeholders. Além da tecnologia, as múltiplas dimensões associadas a um projeto e seus impactos compreendem, por exemplo, as esferas econômica, social, humana e ambiental; similarmente ao arranjo de forças para a sobrevivência e evolução em ecossistemas abrangentes, daí a alusão ao termo “perspectiva ecológica estendida”. A presente abordagem analítica das inovações resultantes dos esforços de P&D é orientada pela teoria da complexidade e pela inter-relação dos conceitos de sustentabilidade, cooperação, aprendizagem e multidimensionalidade.@pt

. An extended ecological point of view to evaluate technological innovations um ponto de vista ecológico estendido para avaliar inovações tecnológicas. Revista p2p e inovação, [????].

References

  • ALVES, A. M. CERTICS Assessment Methodology for Software Technological Development and Innovation. In: INTERNATIONAL IEEE QUATIC CONFERENCE, 9, 2014, Guimaraes, Portugal. 2014. Conference Preoceeding [...], p. 174-177.
  • ALVES, A. M. Proposta de uma estrutura de medição para qualidade do SPB: Software Público Brasileiro. Tese de doutorado – Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2013. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2013.tde-11072014-001021. Acesso em: ANTONELLI, C. (ed.) Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change. Cheltenham: Edward Elagar Publishing, 2011.
  • BEERS, C.., ZAND, F. R and D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Production and Innovation Management, v. 31, n. 2, p. 292-312, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12096
  • BELDERBOS, R.., CARREE, M.., LOKSHIN, B. Cooperative R and D and firm performance. Research Policy, v. 33, p.1477–1492, 2004.
  • BELLEN, H. M. Indicadores de sustentabilidade: Uma análise comparativa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.
  • BUENO, B.., BALESTRIN, A. Inovação colaborativa: Uma abordagem aberta no desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Revista Adm. de Empresas - RAE, v. 52, n. 5, p. 517530, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902012000500004
  • CAMARGO, L. S.., BECKER, M. L. R. O percurso do conceito de cooperação na epistemologia genética. Educação and Realidade, v. 37, n. 2, p. 527-549, 2012.
  • CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: Where we´ve been and where we´re going. ResearchTechnology Management, v. 55, n. 4, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5504085 CHRISTENSEN, C. The inventor’s dilema. Londres: Routledge, 2003.
  • COAD, N.., PRITCHARD, P. Leading sustainable innovation. Routledge. 2013
  • COCCO, G. Indicadores de inovação e capitalismo cognitivo. In: CENTRO DE GESTÃO E ESTUDOS ESTRATÉGICOS. Bases conceituais em pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação: Implicações para políticas no Brasil. Brasília: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos, 2010. p. 33-68.
  • EDWARDS-SCHACHTER, M.., CASTRO-MARTÍNEZ, E.., FERNÁNDEZ-DE-LUCIO, I. International co-operation between firms on innovation and R and D: Empirical evidence from Argentina and Spain. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, v. 6, n. 3, 2011.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Science, research and innovation performance of the EU: A contribution to the open innovation, open science and open to the world agenda. Luxembourg: European Union, 2016. http://dx.doi.org//10.2777/427046. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021.
  • FAEMS, D.., VAN LOOY, B.., DEBACKERE, K. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 22, p. 238–250, 2005.
  • FISCHER, M. M.., DIEZ, J. R.., SNICKARS, F. Metropolitan innovation systems: Theory and evidence from three metropolitan regions in Europe. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
  • FRANCO, M. J.., BARBEIRA, M. Uma análise conceptual de relacionamentos inter-empresas a partir do enfoque da análise estrutural das redes sociais [A conceptual analysis of intercompany relationships based on the structural analysis of social networks]. In: FRANCO, M. J. B. et al. (org.) Cooperação entre empresas, clusters, redes de negócios e inovação tecnológica. Anápolis: Ed. da Universidade Estadual de Goiás, 2009. p. 39-54.
  • FREEMAN, C. The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, p. 5-24, 1995.
  • HARLEY, J.., BLISMAS, N. An anatomy of collaboration within the online environment”. In: ANANDARAJAN, M.., ANANDARAJAN, A. (ed.). e-Research collaboration: theory, techniques and challenges. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  • HOLANDA, G. M.., MATTOS, C. V.., ALVES, A. M. A conceptual and methodological framework for evaluating R and D projects. P2P and Inovação, v. 4, n. 1, p. 141-163, 2017. http://dx.doi.org//10.21721/p2p.2017v4n1.p141-163. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021.
  • JOLIVET, E.., LAREDO, P.., SHOVE, E. Managing breakthrough innovations: The SOCROBUST methodology. In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE R and D MANAGEMENT, 2002, Leuven.
  • KATES, R.W.., PARRIS, T. M.., LEISEROWITZ, A. A. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, v. 47, n. 3, p. 9–21, 2005.
  • KUPFER, D.., AVELLAR, A. P. Innovation and cooperation: Evidences from the Brazilian innovation survey. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ECONOMIA DA ANPEC, 37, Dec. 2009, Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil.
  • LAI, E. R. Collaboration: A literature review. Research Report, Pearson, 2011.
  • LATOUR, B. Nous n´avons jamais été modernes: Essai d´anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte, 1991.
  • LUO, X.., RINDFLEISCH, A.., TSE, D. K. Working with rivals: The impact of competitors alliances on financial performance. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 44, n. 1, p. 78-83, 2007.
  • MALAINA, A. Tecnología y complejidad: Una aproximación multidimensional desde el “pensamiento complejo” de Edgar Morin [Technology and complexity: A multidimensional approach from the "complex thinking" of Edgar Morin]. In: AGNADO, J. M.., SCOTT, B.., BUCHINGER, E. (coord.). Technology and social complexity Murcia. Universidad de Murcia, 2009. p. 63-79.
  • MATEI, A.., ANTOINE, C. Complexity theory and the development of the social innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 185, p. 61-66, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815021643?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021.
  • MATURANA, H.., VARELA, F. De máquinas y seres vivos: Una teoría sobre la organización biológica. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitária, 1973.
  • MIRANDA, E. C.., FIGUEIREDO, P. N. Dinâmica da acumulação de capacidades inovadoras: evidências de empresas de software no Rio de Janeiro e em São Paulo [Dynamics of accumulation of capability for innovation: Evidence from software firms in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo]. ERA - Revista Adm. de Empresas, v. 50, n. 1, p. 75-93, 2010.
  • MOORAR, R.., GALLOUJ, H.., HAMMADOU, H. Public-private innovation networks and innovation activities in French service firms. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, v. 2, n. 10, p. 191-217, 2012.
  • NASCIMENTO, N. R.., SALVADO, L. R.., BORGES, F. F.., HOLANDA, G. M. Fabric Waste Applied to Low Cost Subsurface Irrigation. In: FIBER SOCIETY SPRING 2016
  • CONFERENCE, 2016, Mulhouse - France. p. 177-178. OECD Fostering innovation for green growth. OECD Green Growth Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011b.
  • OECD. Frascati Manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD Publications Service, 2002.
  • OECD. OECD Innovation Strategy 2015: An agenda for policy action. MEETING OF THE OECD COUNCIL AT MINISTERIAL LEVEL, 2015, Paris. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf. Access in: 12 jan. 2021.
  • OECD. Opportunities, challenges and good practices in international research cooperation between developed and developing countries. Global Science Forum, Report, 2011a. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/47737209.pdf. Access in: 12 jan. 2021.
  • OECD. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3rd Ed. Paris: OECD Publications, 2005.
  • PASTOORS, S. et al. Towards sustainable innovation: A five step approach to sustainable change. Marburgo, Alemanha: Tectum Verlag, 2017.
  • PIAGET, J. Estudos sociológicos [Sociological studies]. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1973.
  • SIERRA, C. Managing global alliances key steps for successful collaboration. Boston, Massachusetts, EUA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. 1995.
  • STACEY, R. Complexity and creativity in organizations. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1996.
  • STERMAN, J. D. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. USA: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  • STODDART, H. A Pocket guide to sustainable development governance. Herne Bay UK: Stakeholder Forum, 2011.
  • STOKES, D. E. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington: The Brookings Institution Presse, 1997.
  • TETHER, B. S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, v. 31, p. 947-967, 2002.
  • TORRES, R.., ALMEIDA, S.., TATSCH, A. L. Cooperação e aprendizado em arranjos produtivos locais: Aspectos conceituais e indicadores da Redesist [Cooperation and learning in local productive arrangements]. In: SEMINÁRIO MERCOSUL, 10, Rio de Janeiro, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/textos-e-slides-s10. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021.
  • TSAI, W. Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, v. 13, n. 2, p. 179-1902002.
  • UNITED NATIONS. Global Sustainable Development Report. 2015 Edition – Advanced unedited version. 2015. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport/2015. Access in: 12 jan. 2021.
  • UNITED NATIONS. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ milestones/wced. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021
  • WALKER, P. Working collaboratively: A practical guide to achieving more. Abingdon UK: Routledge, 2013.
  • WU, J. Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 43, n. 2, p. 199–209, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.002. Access in: 12 jan. 2021
NLP0.29
Visto 21 vezes
sem referências
Array
(
    [dateOfAvailability] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [2021-03-15] => 157814
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasAuthor] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Giovanni Moura de Holanda] => 9444
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [Carolina Vaghetti Mattos] => 9446
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [Angela Maria Alves] => 9447
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasFileStorage] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [_repository/245/2021/04/oai_ojs_revista_ibict_br_article_4821#00013.pdf] => 158950
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasPageEnd] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [252] => 9536
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasPageStart] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [221] => 11583
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSectionOf] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Artigo] => 3
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSubject] => Array
        (
            [en] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Project evaluation] => 157812
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [Cooperation] => 177432
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [Innovation] => 178704
                        )

                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [Sustainable development] => 265464
                        )

                    [4] => Array
                        (
                            [Research policy] => 116856
                        )

                )

            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Avaliação de projeto] => 157813
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [Cooperação] => 260950
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [Inovação] => 262113
                        )

                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [Desenvolvimento sustentável] => 266016
                        )

                    [4] => Array
                        (
                            [Política de pesquisa] => 4704
                        )

                    [5] => Array
                        (
                            [Cooperação] => 13642
                        )

                )

        )

    [wasPublicationInDate] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [2021-03-15] => 271457
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasLanguageExpression] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [en] => 232773
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasLicense] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [RESERVERD] => 234643
                        )

                )

        )

    [isPartOfSource] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Revista P2P e INOVAÇÃO] => 245
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasIssueOf] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [ISSUE:JNL:00013-2021-7-] => 156541
                        )

                )

            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [ISSUE:JNL:13:2021-7-2] => 231906
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasAbstract] => Array
        (
            [en] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [This paper describes an analytical approach based on a non-conventional ecological perspective to evaluate the quality of technological innovation projects. The approach is semi-qualitative and focuses on aspects of cooperation in projects and companies with favorable conditions regarding technological advancement and learning maturity, highlighting contributions of these aspects to the sustainability of R&D projects. Moreover, it considers the multidimensionality of a project in order to classify how its innovations align with sustainable principles, in terms of balancing the needs of all stakeholders. Beyond technology, the multiple dimensions associated to a project and its impacts comprise, for example, the economic, social, human and environmental spheres; similarly to the arrangement of forces for survival and evolution in comprehensive ecosystems, hence the allusive use of the term “extended ecological perspective”. Complexity theory and interrelation of the concepts of sustainability, cooperation, learning and multidimensionality underlie this analytical approach of innovations resulting from R&D efforts.] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [This paper describes an analytical approach based on a non-conventional ecological perspective to evaluate the quality of technological innovation projects. The approach is semi-qualitative and focuses on aspects of cooperation in projects and companies with favorable conditions regarding technological advancement and learning maturity, highlighting contributions of these aspects to the sustainability of R&D projects. Moreover, it considers the multidimensionality of a project in order to classify how its innovations align with sustainable principles, in terms of balancing the needs of all stakeholders. Beyond technology, the multiple dimensions associated to a project and its impacts comprise, for example, the economic, social, human and environmental spheres; similarly to the arrangement of forces for survival and evolution in comprehensive ecosystems, hence the allusive use of the term “extended ecological perspective”. Complexity theory and interrelation of the concepts of sustainability, cooperation, learning and multidimensionality underlie this analytical approach of innovations resulting from R&D efforts.] => 0
                        )

                )

            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Este artigo descreve uma abordagem baseada em uma perspectiva ecológica não convencional para avaliar a qualidade de projetos de inovação tecnológica. A abordagem é semi-qualitativa e focaliza os aspectos de cooperação em projetos e empresas com condições favoráveis em termos de avanço tecnológico e maturidade de aprendizagem, destacando contribuições desses aspectos para a sustentabilidade de projetos de P&D. Ademais, considera a multidimensionalidade de um projeto no sentido de classificar como suas inovações alinham-se com princípios de sustentabilidade, no que se refere ao equilíbrio das necessidades de todos os stakeholders. Além da tecnologia, as múltiplas dimensões associadas a um projeto e seus impactos compreendem, por exemplo, as esferas econômica, social, humana e ambiental; similarmente ao arranjo de forças para a sobrevivência e evolução em ecossistemas abrangentes, daí a alusão ao termo “perspectiva ecológica estendida”. A presente abordagem analítica das inovações resultantes dos esforços de P&D é orientada pela teoria da complexidade e pela inter-relação dos conceitos de sustentabilidade, cooperação, aprendizagem e multidimensionalidade.] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasID] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [oai:ojs.revista.ibict.br:article/4821] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasRegisterId] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [10.21721/p2p.2021v7n2.p221-252] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSource] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [P2P & INOVAÇÃO; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): P2P & Inovação; 221-252] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [P2P E INOVAÇÃO; v. 7 n. 2 (2021): P2P & Inovação; 221-252] => 0
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [2358-7814] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasTitle] => Array
        (
            [en] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [An Extended ecological point of view to evaluate technological innovations] => 0
                        )

                )

            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Um ponto de vista ecológico estendido para avaliar inovações tecnológicas] => 0
                        )

                )

            [es] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [ponto de vista ecológico estendido para avaliar inovações tecnológicas] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasUrl] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821/5208] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821/5209] => 0
                        )

                )

            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [https://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [https://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821/5208] => 0
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [https://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/4821/5209] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [prefLabel] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Oai:ojs.revista.ibict.br:article/4821#00013] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasDOI] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [10.21721/p2p.2021v7n2.p221-252] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

)