The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic review in the literature on Altmetry indexed in the Scopus database, in order to outline an overview of what has been discussed at the national level. The methodology of systematic review was adopted because it allows greater control and direction of the steps that constitute bibliographic survey and data analysis. The total number of records retrieved was established and criteria for document analysis were applied. After these steps, summaries were generated in order to represent the main ideas of the documents. The results show that Brazilian researchers with publications indexed in Scopus on Altmetrics sought to conceptualize and understand the theoretical precepts of this quantitative approach, besides seeking to map the social impact of areas and disciplines through altmetric indicators. It is concluded that due to the scope of the research, it is still not enough to prospect about the direction of Altmetry in the national literature, but that the literature analyzed indicates that Altmetry has been established as a methodological approach, to the detriment of its criticisms and limitations.@en
Array ( [dateOfAvailability] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2020-12-29] => 152336 ) ) ) [hasAuthor] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Márcia Regina da Silva] => 8161 ) [1] => Array ( [Ednéia Silva Santos Rocha] => 1446 ) [2] => Array ( [Guilherme Moreira de Souza] => 152850 ) ) ) [hasFileStorage] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [_repository/361/2021/01/oai_revistas_usp_br_article_174826#00022.pdf] => 155905 ) ) ) [hasPageEnd] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [184] => 3172 ) ) ) [hasPageStart] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [162] => 431 ) ) ) [hasSectionOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Artigo] => 3 ) ) ) [hasSubject] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Altmetria] => 227687 ) [1] => Array ( [Métrica alternativa] => 8711 ) [2] => Array ( [Revisão sistemática] => 279825 ) [3] => Array ( [Systematic review] => 177318 ) [4] => Array ( [Métricas alternativas] => 191756 ) ) [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Atlmetrics] => 152849 ) [1] => Array ( [Alternative metrics] => 191755 ) [2] => Array ( [Systematic review] => 274716 ) ) ) [wasPublicationInDate] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2020-12-29] => 244394 ) ) ) [hasLanguageExpression] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [pt] => 232736 ) ) ) [hasLicense] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Copyright (c)] => 232755 ) [1] => Array ( [HTTP://CREATIVECOMMONS.ORG/LICENSES/BY-NC/4.0] => 234611 ) ) ) [isPartOfSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação] => 361 ) ) ) [hasIssueOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [ISSUE:JNL:00022-2020-11-2] => 152828 ) ) ) [hasAbstract] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic review in the literature on Altmetry indexed in the Scopus database, in order to outline an overview of what has been discussed at the national level. The methodology of systematic review was adopted because it allows greater control and direction of the steps that constitute bibliographic survey and data analysis. The total number of records retrieved was established and criteria for document analysis were applied. After these steps, summaries were generated in order to represent the main ideas of the documents. The results show that Brazilian researchers with publications indexed in Scopus on Altmetrics sought to conceptualize and understand the theoretical precepts of this quantitative approach, besides seeking to map the social impact of areas and disciplines through altmetric indicators. It is concluded that due to the scope of the research, it is still not enough to prospect about the direction of Altmetry in the national literature, but that the literature analyzed indicates that Altmetry has been established as a methodological approach, to the detriment of its criticisms and limitations.] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [O objetivo desta pesquisa é realizar uma revisão sistemática na literatura sobre Altmetria indexada na base de dados Scopus, com o intuito de delinear um panorama do que tem sido discutido no âmbito nacional. A metodologia da revisão sistemática foi adotada por permitir maior controle e direcionamento das etapas que constituem o levantamento bibliográfico e a análise de dados. Ao total de registros recuperados foram estabelecidos critérios para elegibilidade e aplicados filtros para a análise documental. Após essas etapas, sínteses foram geradas a fim de representar as ideias principais dos documentos. Os resultados demonstram que os pesquisadores brasileiros com publicações indexadas na Scopus sobre Altmetria buscaram conceituar e entender os preceitos teóricos dessa abordagem quantitativa, bem como mapear o impacto social de áreas e disciplinas por meio de indicadores altmétricos. Conclui-se que pela abrangência da pesquisa ainda não é suficiente fazer prospecções a respeito do direcionamento da Altmetria na literatura nacional, muito embora a literatura analisada sinalize que a Altmetria tem se firmado como abordagem metodológica, apesar de suas críticas e limitações.] => 0 ) ) ) [hasID] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [oai:revistas.usp.br:article/174826] => 0 ) ) ) [hasRegisterId] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [http://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/174826] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v11i2p162-184] => 0 ) ) ) [hasSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação; v. 11 n. 2 (2020); 162-184] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [2178-2075] => 0 ) ) ) [hasTitle] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Brazilian scientific production on alternative metrics: systematic literature review] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Brazilian scientific production on alternative metrics: systematic literature review: systematic literature review] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Produção científica brasileira sobre métricas alternativas: revisão sistemática] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Produção científica brasileira sobre métricas alternativas: revisão sistemática: systematic literature review] => 0 ) ) ) [hasUrl] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [http://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/174826/167494] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/174826] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/174826/167494] => 0 ) ) ) [prefLabel] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Oai:revistas.usp.br:article/174826#00022] => 0 ) ) ) [hasDOI] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v11i2p162-184] => 0 ) ) ) )
Loading ...