Proceeding Brapci-Revistas

. ::none::, [????].

References

  • AGUADO LOPEZ, E. et al. Ibero-america in mainstream science (Thomson Reuters/Scopus): a framented region. Interciencia, Caracas, v. 39, n. 8, p. 570579, 204.
  • GARFIELD, E. Quantitative analysis of the scientific literature and its implications for science policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization, Washington, v. 29, n. , p. 87-95, 995.
  • MOED, H. F. Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 53, n. 3, p. 28-296, 2002.
  • MOSKALEVA, O. et al. Russian Index of Science Citation: overview and review. In: International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 6., 207, Wuhan. Anais... Wuhan: ISSI, 207.
  • NEGISHI, M.., SUN, Y.., SHIGI, K. Citation Database for Japanese Papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 60, n. 3, p. 333-35, 2004.
  • PACKER, A. L.., MENEGHINI, R. O SciELO aos 5 anos: raison d’être, avanços e desafios para o futuro. In: PACKER, A. L. et al. (Org.). SciELO - 15 Anos de Acesso Aberto. Paris: UNESCO, 204.
  • PISLYAKOV, V. Why should we create national citation indexes? Science and Technical Libraries, Moscou, n. 2, p. 65-7, 2007.
  • WU, Y. et al. China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC): history, impact and outlook. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 60, n. 3, p. 385397, 2004.
  • YADAV, B.., YADAV, M. Resources, facilities and services of the Indian citation index (ICI). Library Hi Tech News, Ann Arbor, v. 3, n. 4, p. 2-29, 204.
NLP0.29
Visto 17 vezes
sem referências