Array
(
    [0] => stdClass Object
        (
            [journal] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [id_jnl] => 67
                )

        )

    [1] => stdClass Object
        (
            [section] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [section] => 1094
                )

        )

    [2] => stdClass Object
        (
            [title] => Array
                (
                    [0] => The ins and outs of peer review in academic journal publishing@en
                    [1] => Los entresijos de la revisión por pares en la edición de revistas académicas@es
                )

        )

    [3] => stdClass Object
        (
            [abstract] => Array
                (
                    [0] => External peer review, in any of its forms (double–blind, single–blind, or open), has become so central to academic journals that the value of such publications is often thought to reside primarily in their role as a mechanism for quality control and vali­dation of scientific knowledge. While the importance of peer review is undeniable, in this essay–written from an editorial standpoint–I aim to reflect on the need to make visible other ways in which journals, throughout the entire editorial process, safeguard the quality of what they publish. I also seek to highlight the relevance of editorial work in ensuring that peer review is conducted rigorously and ethically, which in turn provides editors with more reliable elements for making editorial decisions, while also contributing to the improvement of the published texts. I con­clude with some reflections on the challenges editors face in peer review processes and the guidelines that may help them address these challenges.@en
                    [1] => La revisión por pares externos en cualquiera de sus modalidades (doble ciego, ciego simple o abierta) ha llegado a ser tan central en las revistas académicas, que muchas veces se considera que el valor de dichas publicaciones se reduce al hecho de que llevan a cabo ese filtro de calidad y validación del conocimiento científico. Si bien es innegable la importancia de la revisión por pares, en este ensayo, escrito desde el punto de vista editorial, me propongo reflexionar acerca de la necesidad de hacer visibles otras formas en que las revistas, a lo largo de todo el proceso editorial, custo­dian la calidad de los textos que publican, así como resaltar la relevancia del trabajo editorial para que la revisión por pares se lleve a cabo de forma rigurosa y ética, lo cual redunda en que los editores tengan elementos más confiables para tomar deci­siones editoriales, pero también en la mejora de los contenidos publicados. Conclu­yo con algunas reflexiones sobre los problemas a los que se enfrentan los editores en los procesos de revisión por pares y las pautas que pueden servirles para enfrentarlos.@es
                )

        )

    [4] => stdClass Object
        (
            [author] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Lorena Pilloni Martínez
                )

        )

    [5] => stdClass Object
        (
            [subject] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Peer review@en
                    [1] => Academic journals@en
                    [2] => Scientific editing@en
                    [3] => Editors@en
                    [4] => Editorial processes@en
                    [5] => Revisión por pares@es
                    [6] => Revistas académicas@es
                    [7] => Edición científica@es
                    [8] => Editores@es
                    [9] => Procesos editoriales@es
                )

        )

    [6] => stdClass Object
        (
            [source] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [vol] => 28
                    [nr] => 2
                    [year] => 2025
                    [theme] => 
                )

        )

    [7] => stdClass Object
        (
            [datePub] => Array
                (
                    [0] => 2026-01-30
                )

        )

    [8] => stdClass Object
        (
            [DOI] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => DOI
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => 10.22201/dgbsdi.0187750xp.2025.2.1616
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [9] => stdClass Object
        (
            [http] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://bibliotecauniversitaria.dgb.unam.mx/rbu/article/view/1616
                                )

                        )

                    [1] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://bibliotecauniversitaria.dgb.unam.mx/rbu/article/view/1616/1541
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [10] => stdClass Object
        (
            [language] => Array
                (
                    [0] => es
                )

        )

    [11] => stdClass Object
        (
            [license] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [@xml:lang] => es-ES
                            [#text] => http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
                        )

                )

        )

)