Array
(
    [responseDate] => 2025-12-11T14:53:32Z
    [request] => https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/oai
    [GetRecord] => SimpleXMLElement Object
        (
            [record] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                (
                    [header] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                        (
                            [identifier] => oai:ojs.revistas.ucm.es:article/83866
                            [datestamp] => 2023-06-21T08:44:46Z
                            [setSpec] => RGID:ART
                        )

                    [metadata] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                        (
                            [dc] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                                (
                                    [title] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => Bibliometric study on nanoscience and nanotechnology in Mexico based on Web of Science
                                            [1] => Estudio bibliométrico sobre nanociencia y nanotecnología  en México basado en la Web of Science 
                                        )

                                    [creator] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => Trujillo-Cancino, Jose Luis
                                            [1] => Limaymanta, Cesar H. 
                                        )

                                    [subject] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => Information bibliometric studies – Maps
                                            [1] => Bibliometric Maps 
                                            [2] => Science Maps
                                            [3] => Mexico
                                            [4] => Bibliometric Studies 
                                            [5] => Nanoscience
                                            [6] => Bibliometric studies 
                                            [7] => Nanotechnology
                                            [8] => Estudios bibliométricos de la Información
                                            [9] => Mapas
                                            [10] => Mapas bibliométricos
                                            [11] => Mapas de la ciencia
                                            [12] => México
                                            [13] => Estudios bibliométricos
                                            [14] => Nanociencia
                                            [15] => Estudios bibliométricos-Nanotecnología
                                        )

                                    [description] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => It is evident that the nanosciences and nanotechnologies field will have a significant impact on various fields of action and will be linked to the development of a country, so their study is fundamental; On the other hand, the amount of information generated today makes it difficult to study a scientific topic. Therefore, information analysis tools are needed, both methodological and technological; in this context, metric methodologies are adequate to study a scientific field like this; Therefore, the present work aims to carry out a bibliometric study on the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology in Mexico based on the use of scientific mapping. Documentary analysis and the use of metric indicators of activity and relational indicators were used as methods and procedures. In the practical case, the data was taken from the Web of Science Database and Bibliometrix was used to develop the scientific-technological maps. We retrieved 15,876 research articles on N&N published between 1975 and 2021. The experimental results showed that they received an average of 17.61 citations per article, which were written in 2567 journals, more than 98% of the articles are written in English, and as for authors there is an average of 5.66 by document.
                                            [1] => Es evidente que el desarrollo de la nanociencia y la nanotecnología tendrán un impacto importante en varios campos de acción y estarán vinculadas al desarrollo de un país, por lo que su estudio es fundamental; por otra parte, la cantidad de información generada hoy en día hace difícil estudiar un tema científico. Por lo que se necesitan herramientas de análisis de información, tanto metodológicas como tecnológicas; en este contexto, las metodologías métricas son las adecuadas para estudiar un campo científico como este; por lo que el presente trabajo tiene como objetivo realizar un estudio bibliométrico sobre el desarrollo de la nanociencia y la nanotecnología en México a partir del uso del mapeo científico. Se usaron como métodos y procedimientos el análisis documental y el uso de indicadores métricos de actividad e indicadores relacionales. En el caso práctico se tomaron los datos de la Base de datos de la Web of Science y para el desarrollo de los mapas científico-tecnológicos se usó Bibliometrix. Recuperamos 15,876 artículos de investigación sobre N&N publicados entre 1975 y 2021. Los resultados preliminares muestran que recibieron en promedio 17.61 citas por artículo, los cuales fueron publicados en 2567 revistas, más del 98% de los artículos está escritos en inglés, y en cuanto a los autores existe un promedio de 5.66 por documento.
                                        )

                                    [publisher] => Ediciones Complutense
                                    [date] => 2023-06-21
                                    [type] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => info:eu-repo/semantics/article
                                            [1] => info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
                                            [2] => Artículo revisado por pares
                                        )

                                    [format] => application/pdf
                                    [identifier] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/83866
                                            [1] => 10.5209/rgid.83866
                                        )

                                    [source] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2023); 175-201
                                            [1] => Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2023); 175-201
                                            [2] => 1988-2858
                                            [3] => 1132-1873
                                        )

                                    [language] => spa
                                    [relation] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/83866/4564456565998
                                            [1] => /*ref*/Alencar, S. De, Canongia, C., Antunes, A. M. S., & Alencar, M. (2006). The trends and geography of nanotechnological research. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 184(1), 37–48. https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3730
                                            [2] => /*ref*/Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
                                            [3] => /*ref*/Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11192-007-0315-1/METRICS
                                            [4] => /*ref*/Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457417/METRICS
                                            [5] => /*ref*/Chen, K., & Guan, J. (2011). A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2010.10.007
                                            [6] => /*ref*/Cornejo, L. (2015). Nanociencia y nanotecnología. https://nuevastecnologiasy materiales.com/nanociencia-y-nanotecnologia/
                                            [7] => /*ref*/Fernandez, M. T., Morrillo, F., Bordond, M., & Gomez, I. (2002). Estudio bibliométrico de un área científico-tecnológica del Plan Nacional de Investigación de España (2000-2003). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 372–373. https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/11562
                                            [8] => /*ref*/Finardi, U., & Lamberti, C. (2021). Diversity and interdisciplinarity in nanoscience and nanotechnology: a time-related analysis of the subject category. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-020-05119-8/TABLES/9
                                            [9] => /*ref*/Foladori, G., Arteaga Figueroa, E., Záyago Lau, E., Appelbaum, R., Robles-Belmont, E., Villa, L., Parker, R., & Leos, V. (2015). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Key Findings Based on OECD Criteria. Minerva, 53(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9281-6
                                            [10] => /*ref*/Giwa, S. O., Adegoke, K. A., Sharifpur, M., & Meyer, J. P. (2022). Research trends in nanofluid and its applications: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 24(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-022-05453-Z/FIGURES/3
                                            [11] => /*ref*/Gorbea Portal, S. (2001). La representación y organización del conocimiento : metodologías, modelos y aplicaciones: V Congreso Isko España; 2001; Alcalá de Henares, 1–10. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=8602
                                            [12] => /*ref*/Grauwin, S., & Jensen, P. (2011). Mapping scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 89(3), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-011-0482-Y/FIGURES/6
                                            [13] => /*ref*/Guzman-Sanchez, M. V., & Trujillo Cancino, J. L. (2013). Los mapas bibliométricos o mapas de la ciencia: una herramienta útil para desarrollar estudios métricos de información. BIblioteca Universitaria, 16(2), 95–108. www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=28529572002
                                            [14] => /*ref*/Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0507655102/ASSET/ 8BAD4608-B7BF-4215-8D0A-5C29F690AE48/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZPQ0420598740002.JPEG
                                            [15] => /*ref*/Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z. K., & Roco, M. C. (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-004-4117-6/METRICS
                                            [16] => /*ref*/Huang, Z., Wu, L., Wang, W., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Pan, X., & Wu, C. (2021). Unraveling the publication trends in inhalable nano-systems. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-021-05384-1/FULLTEXT.HTML
                                            [17] => /*ref*/Hullmann, A. (2007). Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(3), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0310-6
                                            [18] => /*ref*/Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.A7/METRICS
                                            [19] => /*ref*/Igami, M. (2008). Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics, 77(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-1973-8
                                            [20] => /*ref*/Kay, L., & Shapira, P. (2009). Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9503-Z/TABLES/7
                                            [21] => /*ref*/Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.20991
                                            [22] => /*ref*/Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0303-5
                                            [23] => /*ref*/Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., & Tolles, W. M. (2006). The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-005-9035-8/METRICS
                                            [24] => /*ref*/Leydesdorff, L. (2008). The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, 76(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-1889-3
                                            [25] => /*ref*/Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0308-0/METRICS
                                            [26] => /*ref*/Li, X., Chen, H., Dang, Y., Lin, Y., Larson, C. A., & Roco, M. C. (2008). A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature: 1976-2004. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(SUPPL. 1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9473-1/FIGURES/11
                                            [27] => /*ref*/Li, X., Hu, D., Dang, Y., Chen, H., Roco, M. C., Larson, C. A., & Chan, J. (2009). Nano Mapper: An Internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(3), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9491-Z/TABLES/21
                                            [28] => /*ref*/Lin, M. W., & Zhang, J. (2007). Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics, 70(3), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0302-6/METRICS
                                            [29] => /*ref*/Macias-Chapula, C. A. (2001). Papel de la informetría y de la cienciometría y su perspectiva nacional e internacional. ACIMED, 9(supl), 35–41. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352001000400006
                                            [30] => /*ref*/Maghrebi, M., Abbasi, A., Amiri, S., Monsefi, R., & Harati, A. (2011). A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics, 86(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-010-0304-7/FIGURES/2
                                            [31] => /*ref*/México. CONACyT. (2018). Programa Especial de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación (PECiTI) 2014-2018 (p. 108). PECiTL.
                                            [32] => /*ref*/Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology - Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458355
                                            [33] => /*ref*/Meyer, M. S. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, 51(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010572914033/METRICS
                                            [34] => /*ref*/Mogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. (2007). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36(6), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2007.02.005
                                            [35] => /*ref*/National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2021). 2021 National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan | National Nanotechnology Initiative. www.nano.gov/ 2021strategicplan
                                            [36] => /*ref*/National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2022). About Nanotechnology. https://www.nano.gov/about-nanotechnology
                                            [37] => /*ref*/Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-007-9266-Y/FIGURES/4
                                            [38] => /*ref*/Pourhatami, A., Kaviyani-Charati, M., Kargar, B., Baziyad, H., Kargar, M., & Olmeda-Gómez, C. (2021). Mapping the intellectual structure of the coronavirus field (2000–2020): a co-word analysis. In Scientometrics (Vol. 126, Issue 8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04038-2
                                            [39] => /*ref*/Rios Gomez C., & Herrero Solana, V. (2005). La producción científica latinoamericana y la ciencia mundial: una revisión bibliografica(1989-2003). Revista INteramericana de Bibliotecologia, 2, 43–61. www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid= S0120-09762005000100003
                                            [40] => /*ref*/Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38/METRICS
                                            [41] => /*ref*/Shi, J., Duan, K., Wu, G., Zhang, R., & Feng, X. (2020). Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public–private partnerships (PPPs) research field: a new bibliometric journey. Scientometrics 2020 124:3, 124(3), 2145–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-020-03607-1
                                            [42] => /*ref*/Tague Sutcliffe, J. (1994). Introducción a la informetría. ACIMED, 2(3), 26–35. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94351994000300005
                                            [43] => /*ref*/Tanaka, L. S. (2021). Recomendaciones de política pública de nanociencia y nanotecnología en México: privilegiar el bienestar humano y ambiental. Mundo Nano. Revista Interdisciplinaria En Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, 15(28), 1e-23e. https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2022.28.69655
                                            [44] => /*ref*/Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., Sonker, S. K., & Babbar, P. (2018). Occurrence of author keywords and keywords plus in social sciences and humanities research : A preliminary study. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 12(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2018.1436951
                                            [45] => /*ref*/Vargas Cantin, P., Ortiz Montenegro, I., Rojas Maturana, V., Vargas, P., & Ortiz, I. (2006). Vigilancia tecnológica aplicada a nanociencia y nanotecnología en países de Latinoamérica. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
                                            [46] => /*ref*/Youtie, J., Ward, R., Shapira, P., Porter, A. L., & Newman, N. (2020). Corporate engagement with nanotechnology through research publications. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 23(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-021-05195-4/TABLES/4
                                            [47] => /*ref*/Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 67, Issue 4, pp. 967–972). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
                                            [48] => /*ref*/Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1513–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IPM.2006.03.016
                                            [49] => /*ref*/Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
                                        )

                                    [rights] => Derechos de autor 2023 Revista General de Información y Documentación
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

)