Array
(
    [0] => stdClass Object
        (
            [journal] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [id_jnl] => 108
                )

        )

    [1] => stdClass Object
        (
            [section] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [section] => 1859
                )

        )

    [2] => stdClass Object
        (
            [title] => Array
                (
                    [0] => «Where they don’t want us to be». Coverage of 8M 2021 in Uruguay and its repercussions@en
                    [1] => «Donde no quieren que estemos». Cobertura del 8M de 2021 en Uruguay y sus repercusiones@es
                )

        )

    [3] => stdClass Object
        (
            [abstract] => Array
                (
                    [0] => On March 8, 2021, during a demonstration organized by the feminist movement Montevideo, an incident occurred between some activists and television journalists. This episode, along with its media coverage, generated significant media repercussions. Through thematic analysis, this study examines how Canal 10’s TV news program Subrayado and subsequent news reports narrated the incident. The objectives of this article are to identify the dominant meanings conveyed and analyze those contested in public discourse, as these interpretations shape a broader field of conflict. From this perspective, we ask: How did Canal 10 cover the feminist march on March 8, 2021? What were the dominant narratives in the journalistic approach following the march? Our analysis reveals two main configurations: first, the opposition between the feminist movement and the right to information; and second, the portrayal of the feminist movement as an act of disobedience.@en
                    [1] => El 8 de marzo de 2021, durante la marcha en el centro de Montevideo convocada por parte del movimiento feminista, se produjo un incidente entre algunas manifestantes y periodistas de la televisión. El episodio y su cobertura tuvieron efectos mediáticos posteriores. A través del análisis temático, se estudian las narrativas del incidente por parte del informativo de TV de Canal 10 (Subrayado) y las noticias posteriores. Los objetivos de este artículo son identificar cuáles fueron los sentidos dominantes y analizar aquellos que se disputan en la opinión pública, en tanto estas significaciones configuran un campo de disputa. Es a partir de este suceso que nos preguntamos: ¿Cómo fue la cobertura de Canal 10 en la marcha feminista del 8 de marzo de 2021?, ¿cuáles fueron los sentidos dominantes del abordaje periodístico posterior a la marcha? Encontramos dos configuraciones principales: por un lado, la oposición entre los feminismos y el derecho a la información, y por otro, el feminismo como desobediencia.@es
                )

        )

    [4] => stdClass Object
        (
            [author] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Mercedes Altuna-Michelini
                    [1] => Natalia Bolaña-Caballero
                )

        )

    [5] => stdClass Object
        (
            [subject] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Feminismos@es
                    [1] => Medios de comunicación@es
                    [2] => Televisión@es
                    [3] => Esfera pública@es
                    [4] => Representación@es
                    [5] => Marcha@es
                    [6] => Mujeres@es
                    [7] => Cobertura@es
                    [8] => Prensa@es
                    [9] => Uruguay@es
                    [10] => Feminisms@en
                    [11] => Media@en
                    [12] => Television@en
                    [13] => Public sphere@en
                    [14] => Representation@en
                    [15] => March@en
                    [16] => Women@en
                    [17] => Press coverage@en
                    [18] => Uruguay@en
                )

        )

    [6] => stdClass Object
        (
            [source] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [vol] => 3
                    [nr] => 2
                    [year] => 2025
                    [theme] => 
                )

        )

    [7] => stdClass Object
        (
            [datePub] => Array
                (
                    [0] => 2025-04-25
                )

        )

    [8] => stdClass Object
        (
            [DOI] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => DOI
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => 10.3145/infonomy.25.012
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [9] => stdClass Object
        (
            [http] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://infonomy.scimagoepi.com/index.php/infonomy/article/view/93
                                )

                        )

                    [1] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://infonomy.scimagoepi.com/index.php/infonomy/article/view/93/128
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [10] => stdClass Object
        (
            [language] => Array
                (
                    [0] => es
                )

        )

    [11] => stdClass Object
        (
            [license] => Array
                (
                    [0] => RESERVED
                    [1] => CCBY4.0
                )

        )

)