Array
(
    [responseDate] => 2024-03-20T02:07:10Z
    [request] => https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/reic/oai
    [GetRecord] => SimpleXMLElement Object
        (
            [record] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                (
                    [header] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                        (
                            [identifier] => oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/706
                            [datestamp] => 2020-08-04T17:14:54Z
                            [setSpec] => reic:ART
                        )

                    [metadata] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                        (
                            [dc] => SimpleXMLElement Object
                                (
                                    [title] => On guessing and reasoning: a reply to Paul Bourgine's
                                    [creator] => Farias, Priscila L.
                                    [description] => Charles Peirce ends the above tentative definition of the grounds for abduction by stating that “the effort should therefore be to make each hypothesis, which is practically no more than a question, as near an even bet as possible” (CP 1.121). The reason why I am quoting this passage of the Collected Papers is that I assume it can justify why should I (with no solid background in symbolic logic or mathematics) dare coming up with a debate on Paul Bourgine’s article “Models of abduction.” Taking the following rendition of an abductive inference as a guide: The surprising fact, C, is observed; But if A were true, C would be a matter of course, Hence, there is reason to suspect that A is true. (CP 5.189) I therefore decided to consider Paul’s article as a “surprising fact,” and to try my best in devising relevant questions about it. I believe should thank my deductive capacities for enabling me to extract hopefully clear and reliable consequences from those questions, but I will only be able  to evaluate the pertinence of my efforts after a moment o f induction I expect to share with you, dear reader.
                                    [publisher] => Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
                                    [date] => 2011-07-04
                                    [type] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => info:eu-repo/semantics/article
                                            [1] => info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
                                        )

                                    [format] => application/pdf
                                    [identifier] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/reic/article/view/706
                                            [1] => 10.36311/1807-8281.2000.v2n1.706
                                        )

                                    [source] => Array
                                        (
                                            [0] => Revista Eletrônica Informação e Cognição; v. 2 n. 1 (2000)
                                            [1] => 1807-8281
                                        )

                                    [language] => por
                                    [relation] => https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/reic/article/view/706/609
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

)