Array
(
    [0] => stdClass Object
        (
            [journal] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [id_jnl] => 97
                )

        )

    [1] => stdClass Object
        (
            [section] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [section] => 999
                )

        )

    [2] => stdClass Object
        (
            [title] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Artificial Intelligence and judicial decisions: chronicle of an announced transformation@en
                    [1] => Inteligencia artificial  y decisiones judiciales: crónica  de una transformación anunciada@es
                )

        )

    [3] => stdClass Object
        (
            [abstract] => Array
                (
                    [0] => The penetration of AI (artificial intelligence) in our daily lives is becoming increasingly apparent. Its presence is subtly but unstoppably gaining ground. Our justice system cannot remain unaware of this reality. While there are weak versions of AI that pose hardly any legal or ethical problems by simply making our lives easier, strong AI, capable of making decisions on its own, causes suspicion and animosity in equal proportion. Two fundamental questions stem from this perspective. First, whether it is possible that in a nearby future a robot judge will be able to decide on our wealth and/or freedom. Second if it is convenient and safe for it to do so. This article aims to answer both questions. To do so, we use the traditional methodology in law, consisting in consulting a significant number of bibliographical sources and applicable regulations (still work in progress) to formulate our particular approach to the subject. No jurisprudence was consulted for obvious reasons. The article closes with a reflection looking to the future, containing conclusions and lege ferenda’s recommendations for a future regulation of AI in our legal system.@en
                    [1] => La penetración de la IA (inteligencia artificial) en nuestra vida cotidiana es día a día más perceptible. Su presencia va imponiéndose de forma sutil y a la vez imparable. Nuestro sistema de Justicia no podía ser ajeno a esta realidad. Pero mientras hay versiones débiles de la IA que no plantean apenas problemas jurídicos ni éticos y simplemente nos facilitan la vida, la IA fuerte, capaz de tomar decisiones por ella misma, causa recelo y animadversión a partes iguales. Dos preguntas fundamentales se vislumbran desde esa perspectiva. Una, si es posible que en un futuro no muy lejano un juez robot pueda decidir sobre nuestro patrimonio y/o libertad. Otra, si es conveniente y seguro que lo haga. A ambos interrogantes pretende dar respuesta este artículo. Para ello se hace uso de la metodología tradicional en Derecho que consiste básicamente en consultar un número significativo de fuentes bibliográficas y normativa aplicable (aún en ciernes) para, una vez nutrido así el conocimiento sobre la materia, formular nuestro planteamiento particular sobre el tema. No ha sido posible consultar jurisprudencia por razones evidentes.Finaliza el artículo con un apartado dedicado a reflexionar mirando al futuro, en el que se contienen conclusiones y recomendaciones de lege ferenda para una próxima regulación de la IA en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico.@es
                )

        )

    [4] => stdClass Object
        (
            [author] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Carolina Sanchis Crespo
                )

        )

    [5] => stdClass Object
        (
            [subject] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Inteligencia artificial@es
                    [1] => Decisiones judiciales@es
                    [2] => Juez robot@es
                    [3] => Motivación de las decisiones judiciales@es
                    [4] => Independencia judicial@es
                    [5] => Imparcialidad judicial@es
                    [6] => Artificial intelligence@en
                    [7] => Judicial decisions@en
                    [8] => Robot judge@en
                    [9] => Judicial decision motivations@en
                    [10] => Judicial independence@en
                    [11] => Judicial impartiality@en
                )

        )

    [6] => stdClass Object
        (
            [source] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [vol] => 29
                    [nr] => núm.
                    [year] => 2023
                    [theme] => 
                )

        )

    [7] => stdClass Object
        (
            [datePub] => Array
                (
                    [0] => 2023-11-30
                )

        )

    [8] => stdClass Object
        (
            [DOI] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => DOI
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => 10.54886/scire.v29i2.4937
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [9] => stdClass Object
        (
            [http] => Array
                (
                    [0] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/scire/article/view/4937
                                )

                        )

                    [1] => stdClass Object
                        (
                            [type] => HTTP
                            [value] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/scire/article/view/4937/4375
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [10] => stdClass Object
        (
            [language] => Array
                (
                    [0] => es
                )

        )

    [11] => stdClass Object
        (
            [license] => Array
                (
                    [0] => RESERVED
                    [1] => by-nc-nd/4.0
                )

        )

)