In Information Science context, Subject Analysis is considered one of the most important stages in Indexing and the indexer is the responsible for this activity. An interdisciplinarity with Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Logics is observed during the development of this activity by the indexer. The study discusses factors of these areas that interfere in Subject Analysis. Linguistic factors act in concert with logical and cognitive factors in the intellectual activities that comprise Subject Analysis. So close is their interaction that it is not possible to determine where the influence of one begins or finishes. This reference base is required in order to understand what the text in question is about and in order to assimilate new knowledge. When analyzing a text, the indexer searches the reference base for stored information about the theme of the text and if found comprehension occurs; however, if not found, comprehension is thwarted@en
Array ( [dateOfAvailability] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2019-03-29] => 111603 ) ) ) [hasAuthor] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Madalena Martins Lopes Naves] => 17462 ) [1] => Array ( [Célia da Consolação Dias] => 7646 ) [2] => Array ( [Walter Moreira] => 14617 ) ) ) [hasFileStorage] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [_repository/86/2023/05/oai_ojs_revistas_marilia_unesp_br_article_8023#00004.pdf] => 222880 ) ) ) [hasPageEnd] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [14] => 1345 ) [1] => Array ( [20] => 1549 ) ) ) [hasPageStart] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [5] => 2019 ) [1] => Array ( [15] => 3896 ) ) ) [hasSectionOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Artigo] => 3 ) ) ) [hasSubject] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Subject analysis] => 171935 ) [1] => Array ( [Indexing] => 267512 ) [2] => Array ( [Linguistic] => 6151 ) [3] => Array ( [Cognitive psychology] => 6141 ) [4] => Array ( [Knowledge organization systems] => 174044 ) [5] => Array ( [Thesauri] => 176521 ) [6] => Array ( [Ontologies] => 171756 ) [7] => Array ( [Knowledge organization and representation] => 173236 ) [8] => Array ( [Logic] => 262542 ) [9] => Array ( [Thesauri] => 7358 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Logic] => 187053 ) [1] => Array ( [Sistema de organização do conhecimento] => 270991 ) [2] => Array ( [Tesauro] => 261273 ) [3] => Array ( [Ontologia] => 235984 ) [4] => Array ( [Organização e representação do conhecimento] => 287930 ) [5] => Array ( [Sistemas de organização do conhecimento] => 268563 ) [6] => Array ( [Tesauros] => 201828 ) [7] => Array ( [Ontologias] => 207327 ) ) ) [wasPublicationInDate] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [2019-03-29] => 269290 ) ) ) [hasLanguageExpression] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [en] => 232773 ) [1] => Array ( [pt] => 232736 ) ) ) [hasLicense] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Copyright (c)] => 232755 ) [1] => Array ( [BY-SA/4.0] => 233561 ) ) ) [isPartOfSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Brazilian journal of information science] => 86 ) ) ) [hasIssueOf] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [ISSUE:JNL:00004-2019-13-] => 222454 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [ISSUE:JNL:4:2019-13-1] => 232611 ) ) ) [hasAbstract] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [In Information Science context, Subject Analysis is considered one of the most important stages in Indexing and the indexer is the responsible for this activity. An interdisciplinarity with Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Logics is observed during the development of this activity by the indexer. The study discusses factors of these areas that interfere in Subject Analysis. Linguistic factors act in concert with logical and cognitive factors in the intellectual activities that comprise Subject Analysis. So close is their interaction that it is not possible to determine where the influence of one begins or finishes. This reference base is required in order to understand what the text in question is about and in order to assimilate new knowledge. When analyzing a text, the indexer searches the reference base for stored information about the theme of the text and if found comprehension occurs; however, if not found, comprehension is thwarted] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [It discusses the concepts of organization and representation of knowledge as fundamentals for the understanding of thesauri and ontologies took as modalities of knowledge organization systems. The analysis of the complementarity relationships between the two instruments is necessary to reaffirm the conception that the technological and, above all, the categorial aspect brings them closer instead of isolating them. In subordinating the concepts of thesauri and ontologies to the broader concept of knowledge organization systems, it reflects on some of its theoretical and applied implications. Such reflections are guided by the way each instrument understands associative conceptual relationships. It is concluded that the technological apparatus used to characterize the concepts and their relationships in the ontologies contributes to the construction of more sophisticated thesauri from when considering the need to make explicit the concepts and the conceptual relationships that the instruments aim to establish. In another direction and in a complementary way, the categorial and faceted analysis model used in the construction of thesauri also contributes to the construction of semantically and structurally denser ontologies.] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Discute os conceitos de organização e representação do conhecimento como subsídios para a compreensão dos tesauros e das ontologias enquanto modalidades de sistemas de organização do conhecimento. A análise das relações de complementaridade entre ambos os instrumentos faz-se necessária para reafirmar a concepção de que o aspecto tecnológico e, principalmente, categorial mais os aproxima do que os isola. Subordinando, portanto, os conceitos de tesauro e de ontologias ao conceito mais amplo de sistemas de organização do conhecimento, reflete sobre algumas de suas implicações teóricas e aplicadas. Tais reflexões são orientadas pelo modo como cada instrumento compreende as relações conceituais associativas. Conclui-se que o aparato tecnológico que se utiliza para a caracterização dos conceitos e de suas relações nas ontologias contribui para a construção de tesauros mais sofisticados do ponto de vista da explicitação dos conceitos e das relações conceituais que visa estabelecer. Em outra direção e de modo complementar, o modelo de análise categorial e facetado empregado na construção de tesauros também contribui para a construção de ontologias semântica e estruturalmente mais densas. ] => 0 ) ) ) [hasID] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8023] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8277] => 0 ) ) ) [hasRegisterId] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8023] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.02.p5] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277] => 0 ) [3] => Array ( [10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.03.p15] => 0 ) ) ) [hasSource] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019); 05-14] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 13 n. 1 (2019); 05-14] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [1981-1640] => 0 ) [3] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019); 15-20] => 0 ) [4] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 13 n. 1 (2019); 15-20] => 0 ) ) [es] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019); 05-14] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019); 15-20] => 0 ) ) ) [hasTitle] => Array ( [en] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis] => 0 ) ) [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [TESAUROS E ONTOLOGIAS COMO MODELOS DE SISTEMAS DE ORGANIZAÇÃO DO CONHECIMENTO] => 0 ) ) ) [hasUrl] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8023/5642] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277/5643] => 0 ) ) [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8023] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8023/5642] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277] => 0 ) [3] => Array ( [https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277/5643] => 0 ) ) ) [prefLabel] => Array ( [pt] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8023#00004] => 0 ) ) ) [hasDOI] => Array ( [nn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.02.p5] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.03.p15] => 0 ) ) ) )
Loading ...