Proceeding Brapci-Autoridades

[erro abnt]

References

  • BONACICH, P. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1170–1182, 1 mar. 1987.
  • FREEMAN, L. C. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social networks, v. 1, n. 3, p. 215–239, 1979.
  • GLÄNZEL, W. Coathorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study with Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies. Library Trends, v. 50, n. 3, p. 461, Winter 2002.
  • GLÄNZEL, W.., SCHUBERT, A. Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In: MOED, H. F.., GLÄNZEL, W.., SCHMOCH, U. (Eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: : The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of Samp.,T Systems. Netherlands: Springer, 2004. p. 257–276.
  • GUARNACCIA, C. et al. Differences in social representation of blood donation between donors and non-donors: an empirical study. Blood Transfusion = Trasfusione Del Sangue, p. 1–7, 4 nov. 2015.
  • HANNEMAN, R. A.., RIDDLE, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, 2005. Disponível em: lt.,http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/gt.,.
  • KATZ, J. S.., MARTIN, B. R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1–18, mar. 1997.
  • LAUDEL, G. What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, v. 11, n. 1, p. 3–15, 2002.
  • MELIN, G.., PERSSON, O. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, v. 36, n. 3, p. 363–377, 1 jul. 1996.
  • NAGPAUL, P. S. Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics, v. 54, n. 2, p. 213–228, 1 jun. 2002.
  • NEWMAN, M. Networks: An Introduction. 1. ed. USA: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • NEWMAN, M. E. J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 101, n. suppl_1, p. 5200–5205, 23 jan. 2004.
  • NOOY, W. DE., MRVAR, A.., BATAGELJ, V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. USA: Routeledge, 2005.
  • RODRIGUES, M. M. D. et al. Activities Offered to the Elderly in Primary Health Care: Social Representations of Elderly and Professionals. International Archives of Medicine, v. 8, n. 0, 17 nov. 2015.
  • ROYAL SOCIETY. Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. UK: Royal Society, 2011.
  • SAMPAIO, R. B. As estruturas globais e regionais do campo de pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação das doenças negligenciadas leishmaniose e tuberculose sob a ótica das redes complexas. Doutorado (Ciência da Informação)—Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 2015.
  • SAMPAIO, R. B. et al. A colaboração científica na pesquisa sobre coautoria: um método baseado na análise de redes. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 20, n. 4, p. 79–92, 17 dez. 2015.
  • SONNENWALD, D. H. Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 41, n. 1, p. 643–681, 1 jan. 2007.
  • SPINAK, E. Quantitative analyses of scientific literature and their validity for judging Latin American Production. Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), v. 29, n. 4, p. 352–60, 1995.
  • VANTI, N. A Cientometria revisitada à luz da expansão da ciência, da tecnologia e da inovação. PontodeAcesso, v. 5, n. 3, p. 5–31, 1 fev. 2012.
  • VILAN FILHO, J. L.., MUELLER, S. P. M. Periódicos brasileiros das áreas de informação: prestígio e interdisciplinaridade. Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria, v. 4, p. POSTER-03, 2014 .
  • WASSERMAN, S.., FAUST, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. 1. ed. USA: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • YANCEY, R. Fifty years of citation indexing and analysis. Science, set. 2005.
NLP0.29
Visto 14 vezes
sem referências