Article Brapci-Autoridades

The impact of contemporary modes of production in university presses

Leilah Santiago Bufrem
Fábio Mascarenhas e Silva
Anna Elizabeth Galvão Coutinho Correia
Lidiane dos Santos Carvalho

The aim of the present article was to investigate, through a literature analysis, how contemporary modes of production impact univer-sity presses considering the social, political and economic contexts. The methodological approach consisted of two stages of collec-tion from the Web of Science database: in the first stage we retrieved 42 items related to changes in university presses over the last few years. In the second stage we analyzed 62 papers, related to information technology, refined from the concept of open access as a socio-technical concept. Five categories were selected for the content analysis of the papers: a) publishing market; b) dynamics of publisher; c) interaction with libraries; d) science communication, e) copyright. As the result, we discuss the advantages and potential of open access literature as of 2000, as well as the challenges for ideal, unrestricted and unlimited access to the intellectual production. We argue that further studies should focus on public and private relations, restricted access or open access, production resources, market, book prices, relations of publishing houses and other entities, institutions or companies, treatment of copyright, rep-resentation of society, committees and editorial boards.@en

. The impact of contemporary modes of production in university presses. Brazilian journal of information science, [????].

References

  • Cohn S.., Brondoli, M.., Bedell, M.., Woodford, B. (1996). If Publishers Perished, Just What Would Be Lost? // Ser. Libr. 28:3-4 (Oct.1996) 371–375.
  • Coleman, R. (2009). Publishing and the Digital Library: Adding Value to Scholarship and Innovation to Business. // Learn. Publ. 22:4 (2009) 297–303.
  • Correia, A. M. R.., Teixeira, J. C. (2005). Reforming Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Communication - From the Advent of the Scholarly Journal to the Challenges of Open Access. // Online Inf. Rev. 29:4 (2005) 349–364.
  • Davis, P. M.., Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv Lead to Higher Citations and Reduced Publisher Downloads for Mathematics Papers? // Scientometrics 71:2 (2005) 203–215.
  • De Vries, S. C. J. (2007). From Sailing Boat to Steamship: The Role of the Publisher in an Open Access Environment. // Learn. Publ. 20:3 (July 2007) 196–201.
  • Dierickx, H.., Evans, J. (1996). EUROLIB and SPARDIN: A tale of two continents. // Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 28:1 (2007) 59–78.
  • Greco, A. N.., Jones, R. F.., Wharton, R. M.., Estelami, H. (2007). The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997-2004. // J. Sch. Publ. 39:1 (2007) 1–32.
  • Greco, A. N.., Jones, R. F.., Wharton, R. M.., Estelami, H. (2007). The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997-2004. // J. Sch. Publ. 39:1 (2007) 1–32.
  • Hanlon, A.., Ramirez, M. (2011). Asking Permission: A Survey of Copyright Workflows for Institutional Repositories. // PortalLibraries Acad. 11:2 (2011) 683–702.
  • Jagodzinski, C. M. (2008). The University Press in North America: A Brief History. // J. Sch. Publ. 40:1 (2008) 1–20.
  • Koehler, A. E. C. (2006). Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Open Access for University Library Technical Services. // Ser. Rev.
  • 32:1 (2006) 17–21.
  • Labarre, A. (1981). História do livro. São Paulo: Cultrix: INL, 1981.
  • Lewis, S. (1995). From Earth to Ether: One Publisher’s Reincarnation. // Ser. Libr. 25:3-4 (1995) 173–180.
  • Melero, R.., Rodríguez-Gairín, J.M.., Abad-García, F.., Abadal, E. (2014). "Journal author rights and self-archiving: the case of
  • Spanish journals", Learned Publishing, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 107-120. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20140205)
  • Nagaraja, A.., Joseph, S. A.., Polen, H. H., Clauson, K. A. (2011). Disappearing Act Persistence and Attrition of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) in an Open Access Medical Journal. // Program-Electronic Libr. Inf. Syst. 45:1 (2011) 98–106.
  • Regazzi, J. J.., Caliguiri, N. A. (2006). Publisher and Author Partnership: A Changing Landscape. // Learn. Publ. 19:3 (2006) 183.
  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. Los Angeles: Sage publications.2008.
  • Sisler, W. P. (1996). Defining the Image of the University Press. //J. Sch. Publ. 28:1 (1996) 55–59.
  • Stumpf, I. R. C. (1998). Periódicos científicos. Porto Alegre: ABEBD, 1998.
  • Thatcher, S. G. (2015). Open-Access Monograph Publishing and the Origins of the Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing at Penn
  • State University. // J. Sch. Publ. 46:3 (2015) 203–223.
  • Viñao Frago, A. (1998). Por una história de la cultura escolar: enfoques, cuestiones, fuentes. // Fernandes, C. A. et al. Cultura y civilizaciones. III Congreso de la Asociación de História Contemporánea, 1998. Valladolid: Secretariado de Publicaciones y Intercambio Cientifíco, Universidad de Valladolid, 1998. 167-183
  • Walsh, M. P. (2011). Repurposing MARC Metadata for an Institutional Repository Working with Special Collections and University Press Monographs. // Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 55:1 (2011) 33–44.
  • Walters, W. H.., Linvill, A. C. (2011). Bibliographic Index Coverage of Open-Access Journals in Six Subject Areas. // J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62 :8 (2011) 1614–1628.
  • Wittenberg, K. (1996). Managing an Acquisitions Program: Defining, Creating, and Implementing the Job. // J. Sch. Publ. 28:1 (1996) 30–34.
NLP0.29
Visto 26 vezes
sem referências
Array
(
    [dateOfAvailability] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [2018-05-14] => 14662
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasAuthor] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Leilah Santiago Bufrem] => 4219
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [Fábio Mascarenhas e Silva] => 9833
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [Anna Elizabeth Galvão Coutinho Correia] => 7391
                        )

                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [Lidiane dos Santos Carvalho] => 6546
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasFileStorage] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [_repository/86/2018/09/oai_ojs_www2_marilia_unesp_br_article_6703#00004.pdf] => 48929
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSectionOf] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Papers] => 89
                        )

                )

        )

    [isPartOfSource] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Brazilian journal of information science] => 86
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasIssueOf] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [ISSUE:JNL:00004-2018-12 NO 1-1] => 14659
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasAbstract] => Array
        (
            [en] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [The aim of the present article was to investigate, through a literature analysis, how contemporary modes of production impact univer-sity presses considering the social, political and economic contexts. The methodological approach consisted of two stages of collec-tion from the Web of Science database: in the first stage we retrieved 42 items related to changes in university presses over the last few years. In the second stage we analyzed 62 papers, related to information technology, refined from the concept of open access as a socio-technical concept. Five categories were selected for the content analysis of the papers: a) publishing market; b) dynamics of publisher; c) interaction with libraries; d) science communication, e) copyright. As the result, we discuss the advantages and potential of open access literature as of 2000, as well as the challenges for ideal, unrestricted and unlimited access to the intellectual production. We argue that further studies should focus on public and private relations, restricted access or open access, production resources, market, book prices, relations of publishing houses and other entities, institutions or companies, treatment of copyright, rep-resentation of society, committees and editorial boards.] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasID] => Array
        (
            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/6703] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasRegisterId] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/bjis/article/view/6703] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [10.5016/brajis.v12i1.6703] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSource] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol 12 No 1 (2018)] => 0
                        )

                    [1] => Array
                        (
                            [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 12 n. 1 (2018)] => 0
                        )

                    [2] => Array
                        (
                            [1981-1640] => 0
                        )

                )

            [es] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018)] => 0
                        )

                )

            [nn] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [10.5016/brajis.v12i1] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasTitle] => Array
        (
            [en] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [The impact of contemporary modes of production in university presses] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasUrl] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/bjis/article/view/6703/5003] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [prefLabel] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                    [0] => Array
                        (
                            [oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/6703#00004] => 0
                        )

                )

        )

    [hasSubject] => Array
        (
            [pt] => Array
                (
                )

        )

)