Proceeding Brapci-Autoridades

[erro abnt]

References

  • ALLISON P. Inequality of scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, v. 1, n. 10, 163–179. 1980.
  • BENSMAN S. Distributional Differences of the Impact Factor in the Sciences Versus the Social Sciences: An Analysis of the Probabilistic Structure of the 2005 Journal Citation Reports. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 9,1366–1382, 2008.
  • CHADEGANI A. A., SALEHI H., YUNUS M. M., FARHADI H., FOOLADI M., FARHADI M., EBRAHIM N. A. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases . Asian Social Science, V.9, n. 5, 2013.
  • CONOVER, W.J. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
  • CRONIN, B. Metatheorizing citation. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, p. 45-55, 1998.
  • FERNANDÉZ-LLIMÓS, F. Análisis de la cobertura del concepto de Pharmaceutical Care en fuentes primarias y secundarias de información. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2003.
  • KALTENBORN F. K. Validity and fairness of the impact factor. Birkhäuser, 2004.
  • GARFIELD, E.., SHER I. H. 1961 Science Citation Index. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 1963. 2672 p.
  • GARFIELD E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ, 979-980, 1999.
  • GARFIELD E. Citation Frequency as a Measure of Research Activity and Performance. Essays of an Information Scientist, v.1, p.406-408, 1973.
  • GARFIELD E. The Agony and the Ecstasy - The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact. In: International Congress on Peer Review And Biomedical Publication Chicago, 2005.
  • GLÄNZEL, W., SCHOEPFLIN, U., A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences, Information Processing and Management, 31-44,1999, 31-44.
  • GLÄNZEL W., MOED F. H. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, n. 2002.
  • GLÄNZEL, W. Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. [S.l.]: Coursehandouts, 2003.
  • MARCHLEWSKI C., SILVA M. P., SORIANO B. J. A Influência do sistema de avaliação Qualis na produção do conhecimento científico: algumas reflexões sobre a Educação Física. Motriz, Rio Claro, v. 17, n. 1, jan-mar., 2011.
  • MOED, H. F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. In: Information Science and Knowledge Management, v. 9. Springer, 2010.
  • PERITZ, B. C., Are Methodological Papers More Cited than Theoretical or Empirical Ones? The Case of Sociology, Scientometrics, v. 5, n. 4 1983, 211-218.
  • PRICE D. J. Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149(3683):510-515, 1965.
  • RUSSELL, J.M., and ROUSSEAU, R. Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation. In R. Arvantis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Part 19.3: Science and technology policy, 2002.
  • SEGLEN, P.O. Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy, v. 52 (11), p. 1050-1056, 1997.
  • SILVA R. M. Qualis 2011-20123 – os três erres. São Paulo. Clinics, v. 65, n. 10, jan. 2010.
  • SIMONS K. The misused Impact Factor. Science, v. 322 (5899), n. 10, 2008.
  • SPINAK, E. Indicadores cienciométricos. Ciência da Informação, v. 27, n. 2, p. 141-148, 1998.
  • THORNLEY, C.., et al. The role of trust and authority in the citation behaviour of researchers. Information Research, v. 20, n. 3, set. 2015.
  • WEALE A. R., BAILEY M., LEAR P. A. The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, p. 4-14, 2004.
  • WALTMAN L. The importance of taking a clear position in the impact factor debate. In: CWTS (Centre for Science and Technology Studies) Meaningful metric, Blog, Leiden University, The Netherlands, 2016.
  • WHITE, H. D. ., McCAIN K. W. Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. v. 49, n. 4:327–355, 1998.
NLP0.29
Visto 14 vezes
sem referências